As the world continues to evolve and the responsibilities of leadership become increasingly demanding, the question arises: where do our leaders go when their nations face pressing challenges? A recent case in point is Cameroon’s 91-year-old President Paul Biya, whose extended absence from public view has raised eyebrows and sparked speculation about his health and leadership.
Cameroon authorities recently reassured the public that Biya is merely on a visit to Europe, dismissing concerns about his health as “fantasy.” This comes after he was last seen at the China-Africa summit a month ago. Since then, he has missed several key gatherings, including the United Nations General Assembly and the International Organization of La Francophonie summit in France, leaving many to wonder about his commitment to addressing critical issues at home.
Biya, who has been in power since 1982 and is Africa’s second-longest-serving leader, exemplifies a troubling trend among some African leaders—frequent travel abroad while domestic problems remain unresolved. This pattern is not unique to Biya; many leaders across the continent prioritize international engagements, often at the expense of their responsibilities to their citizens.
While the president of a nation should represent the interests of their people, the tendency to abandon their posts can lead to feelings of neglect and frustration among citizens. In Biya’s case, Cameroon grapples with significant challenges, including a secessionist movement in its English-speaking regions and ongoing threats from the Boko Haram extremist group. These crises demand immediate attention and decisive action, yet the president’s absence suggests a troubling disconnect from the realities facing the nation.
The implications of this kind of leadership extend far beyond the individual leader. Citizens often feel disenfranchised and voiceless when their leaders prioritize international travel over addressing pressing national issues. This disconnect can lead to protests and civil unrest, as seen in Nigeria recently, where citizens expressed frustration over economic hardships and government inaction.
Moreover, the absence of leaders can embolden opposition parties and create a vacuum of leadership that exacerbates existing tensions. Rights groups have accused Biya’s administration of using oppressive tactics to maintain control, further alienating the populace and stifling dissent. In times of crisis, strong leadership is essential; yet, when leaders are often seen jet-setting around the world, it raises questions about their commitment to their nations.
As African nations continue to navigate complex socio-economic challenges, the need for leaders who prioritize their people’s needs has never been more pressing. Accountability must be at the forefront of leadership, as citizens demand that their leaders address local issues with the urgency they deserve.
Meanwhile, we have presidents like Paul Kagame of Rwanda has garnered attention for his hands-on approach to governance and commitment to national development. Since taking office in 2000, Kagame has focused on rebuilding Rwanda after the devastating genocide, emphasizing economic growth, healthcare, and education. His administration is known for its active engagement with citizens and accountability in addressing local issues. Unlike many of his counterparts, Kagame has prioritized staying close to home, often visiting rural communities and promoting initiatives that directly impact the Rwandan populace. This dedication has fostered a sense of trust and unity among Rwandans, showcasing a model of leadership that prioritizes the nation’s needs over personal or international pursuits
As the world watches, the hope is that leaders across Africa will prioritize the needs of their nations over personal agendas and international engagements, fostering a sense of unity and progress in their respective countries. The challenge lies in re-establishing that vital connection with the people they serve.
